Kirchhoff Prestack Depth
An interval velocity model in depth, eikonal travel-time tables through it, Kirchhoff prestack depth migration into common image gathers — and an interactive session that updates the model from the gathers the last migration produced. Anisotropy is carried in the model, where it belongs.
Everything downstream rests on this model.
The depth model starts as a conversion of what time processing already knows, and is then refined by tomography, by picking on migrated gathers, and by the anisotropy the data itself reveals.
Kirchhoff in depth, three ways to run it.
The integral solution to the wave equation, evaluated with Green's functions built from the travel-time tables: amplitudes are summed along the operator and mapped to a reflectivity model in depth. What changes between runs is the size of the job and what it is for.
The main pass: PreSTM or enhanced gathers plus the tables and a stack for header mapping, producing depth common image gathers. Aperture constant or varying with depth, an anti-alias coefficient and maximum frequency, a maximum angle aperture, and the option to image near offsets only from a dedicated near-offset table.
The same algorithm executed panel by panel, each offset cube migrated independently. It keeps very large surveys tractable and gives offset-separated output for amplitude work. CPU or GPU, distributed across the cluster, with each node writing to local storage for better I/O.
For velocity work the raw shots are migrated on demand at the bin under analysis with the current model, so a layer's semblance can be recomputed without re-migrating the survey.
Read the gathers, correct the model.
Residual moveout on a depth gather is the model's error made visible. The imaging session is built around picking it, applying it and seeing what the correction did — and around producing everything the interpreter needs from the same run.
Six steps, and then round again.
Depth is the last step of a long chain.
The same project, the same batch processing and the same cluster carry a survey from field tape through to depth. These are the other topics in the g-Platform workflow.
Questions, answered.
What does depth imaging give me that time imaging cannot?
Where does anisotropy enter the depth chain?
How is the depth velocity model updated?
What products come out of a PSDM run?

Build the depth model on your own survey.
From a converted time model through travel-time tables and PreSDM to gathers flat enough to stop iterating — take g-Platform for a trial run, or talk to Geomage about a depth project.





