MultiFocusing

Case studies

Eighteen MultiFocusing datasets from twelve countries — land and marine, 2D and 3D, stack through pre-stack depth migration. In most of them the left-hand panel is not raw data but the operator’s own finished processing.

Pin - Case studies

01

Canada – British Columbia, Canadian Foothills – Land data – PSTM

A 2-D line recorded under difficult Foothills conditions, where rugged topography and complex subsurface structure make acquisition, processing and interpretation alike very difficult. Conventional CMP processing of this line could not produce an interpretable image.

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Canada British Columbia
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Canada British Columbia

Geological analysis

Seismic exploration in the Canadian Foothills, as in many thrust belt terranes, is difficult and expensive because of extremely rugged topography and steeply dipping, high-velocity rocks at surface. Even high-fold data bought with an expensive source effort can give sections too saturated with noise to interpret — in an area where lines cost millions of dollars to shoot and wells tens of millions to drill, a better method of seismic imaging is required.

The area is characterised by multiple stages of thrust faulting. The centre of the image shows a series of duplex thrust features above a sub-horizontal decollement surface and capped by a roof thrust. Several individual duplexes that are excellent exploration targets can be seen on the MultiFocusing section; the roof thrust above them carries the sediments exposed at surface as a large anticlinorium.

MultiFocusing greatly improves the signal-to-noise ratio and gives a clear image of the complex sub-surface structure. The conventional processing not only fails to reveal the detail of the duplexes — it does not even show the large-amplitude anticlinorium that can be mapped at surface.

02

Canada – British Columbia – Land data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Canada British Columbia Land
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Canada British Columbia Land
03

USA – Southern California – Land data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - South California
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - South California
04

Gabon – Marine data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Gabon Marine
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Gabon Marine
05

Russia – Timan-Pechora Basin – Land data – PSTM

MultiFocusing applied to old, low-fold data over thrust and block structures, steeply dipping layers and complex fault systems. A complete conventional CMP package — filtration, deconvolution, DMO and post-stack migration — did not reveal the reflections needed for proper geological interpretation.

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Russia Timan-Pechora
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Russia Timan-Pechora

Geological analysis

MultiFocusing raised the signal-to-noise ratio enough to interpret every key horizon. Areal interlocking of those horizons then let the target groups of objects be mapped, and several 2D lines were processed over the area, allowing the interpreter to build a 3D map that clearly delineated these complex structures. The results of this case study have been confirmed by drilling.

The region belongs to the Timan-Pechora hydrocarbon basin. All Timan-Pechora swells trend northwest and have a horst-imbricate structure, broken into wedge-like blocks that include anticlinal structures — an indication of good hydrocarbon prospects throughout the entire geological section. The swells developed during the Carboniferous and Lower Permian; the local structures that further complicated the subsurface were complete by the early Triassic.

The time sections clearly display an inconsistency in the structural stages. Ordovician–Silurian deposition took place under trough conditions on the right-hand side of the sections, where the formations are considerably thicker than in the western areas on the left, where sedimentation took place in a shallower environment. The left-hand part shows the autochthonous tectonic dislocations, the right-hand part the allochthonous zones; evidence of stretching is visible on the tops of the anticline hinges in the Permian interval, which produced the fan-like configuration of the structure.

06

Russia – Ural Foothills – Land data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Russia Ural Foothills
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Russia Ural Foothills
07

Russia – Western Siberia – Land data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Russia Western Siberia
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Russia Western Siberia
08

Russia – Yakutia – Land data – Stack

MultiFocusing lets the explorationist see geological structures that were previously invisible. A problematic surface environment, complex structure and insufficient stacking fold had made accurate imaging impossible through conventional CMP processing.

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Russia Yakutia
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Russia Yakutia

Geological analysis

The area’s geological history includes numerous complex structural forms caused by active tectonic processes — a salt core, for example, has been identified in the central part of the time section.

On the section processed by the conventional CMP method the internal structure of each formation is shown only in a general sense, and the salt lens can only be inferred. MultiFocusing not only displays the tectonic structure of the site, it also shows details of the fault zone confining the salt lens on the west. The salt body is well imaged on the east, the pinchout of the relevant stratigraphic interval is clearly defined, and the bottom of the salt shows up exceptionally well.

09

Russia – Kamchatka – Land data – Stack

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Kamchatka
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Kamchatka
10

Uzbekistan – Land data – Post-STM

MultiFocusing significantly increases both the signal-to-noise ratio and the bandwidth of the data — bandwidth because MultiFocusing moveout is free of the NMO stretch that conventional NMO-based approaches suffer from.

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Uzbekistan
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Uzbekistan

Geological analysis

The MultiFocusing result is a more accurate seismic image than the conventionally processed section. Not only is the continuity of the reflections improved, stratigraphy is revealed in great detail, with much better reflector continuity and bandwidth through the shallow Jurassic to Cretaceous section.

More impressive still is the deeper part of the section. This interval was a structural depression unevenly filled with Palaeozoic sediments; paleo-faulting, onlap, offlap, erosional truncation and possible reefing can all be read easily on the MultiFocusing section, and are stratigraphic detail the conventional CMP method cannot come close to achieving.

11

Pakistan – Land data – Stack

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Pakistan
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Pakistan
12

Kazakhstan – Zaisan – Land data – PSDM in time

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Kazakhstan Zaisan
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Kazakhstan Zaisan
13

China – Land data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - China
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - China
14

Russia – East Siberia – Land data – Stack

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Russia East Siberia
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Russia East Siberia
15

Papua New Guinea – Land data – PSTM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Papua New Guinea
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Papua New Guinea
16

Argentina – Cañadon Asfalto Basin – Land data – Post-STM

A Patagonian dataset where shallow basalt flows hamper interpretation. Severe tectonic deformation left broken-up reflectors and a complicated wavefield; the conventional velocity field was irregular, and smoothing it before migration only increased the overall velocity uncertainty.

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Cañadon Asfalto Basin Argentina
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Cañadon Asfalto Basin Argentina

Geological analysis

The complex overburden, combined with strong lateral velocity variations and deformed, tectonised interfaces, made this land dataset a major imaging challenge. Gravity and magnetotelluric surveys had supplied only the basic shape of the basin.

MultiFocusing shows a remarkable overall improvement in structural resolution over the conventional processing in the poor-data zones — below salt domes, overthrusts, shallow basalt layers and permafrost — and a significant increase in signal-to-noise ratio. Supergathers and the MultiFocusing moveout compensation are what buy that: stacking a large number of traces across many CMP gathers increases the stacking power, which is particularly useful for low-fold coverage, and the moveout correction itself is stretch-free.

The reprocessing led to a better understanding of the structural and sedimentary development of the basin, and gave the exploration team a more reliable tool for maturing a drillable exploration prospect.

17

Colombia – Land data – Post-STM

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Colombia
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Colombia
18

Libya – Sirte Basin – Land data – Stack

Conventional vs MultiFocusing
Conventional Seismic data before MultiFocusing processing - Libya Sirte Basin
MultiFocusing Seismic data after MultiFocusing processing - Libya Sirte Basin